Soft Paternalism Debate
Edward and Russ engage in a thought-provoking discussion on the concept of soft paternalism, exploring its implications in areas like motorcycle helmet regulation and the slippery slope towards hard paternalism. They delve into the complexities and consequences of government intervention, offering insights on the potential risks and unintended consequences of well-intentioned policies.In this clip
From this podcast
EconTalk
Ed Glaeser on the Economics of Paternalism
Related Questions
Are there trade-offs with helmet laws?
How do we make difficult choices in the context of the episode Ed Glaeser on the Economics of Paternalism and the clip Soft vs. Hard Paternalism?
How would the choice of riding a motorcycle apply to the discussion about risky but fun activities, when done for fun versus as the better commute option (skipping traffic, ease of parking)?