The Surprising Reason Why Science is Often Wrong | Gary Taubes

Historical Practices

The historical approach to diabetes treatment reveals a fascinating evolution in dietary practices. Gary Taubes highlights the case of John Rollo, a British army doctor who, in the late 18th century, successfully treated diabetes with a diet devoid of plant foods, focusing instead on fatty meats. This approach, akin to a ketogenic diet, was revolutionary at the time and became the standard of care for diabetes, particularly type two, throughout the 19th century 1.

The diabetes gets better or goes into remission. And Rollo publishes subsequent editions that you can download from Google books reporting on what these doctors said.

--- Gary Taubes

Gabrielle Lyon and Gary discuss how these historical practices challenge modern dietary guidelines, which often emphasize carbohydrates despite their problematic role in diabetes management 2.

   

Study Critique

The critique of nutritional studies centers on the flawed methodologies often employed in epidemiology. Gary criticizes the lack of rigor in observational epidemiology, where assumptions are made without meticulous scrutiny. He shares his experience of transitioning from physics to epidemiology, noting the stark contrast in scientific rigor 3.

I was stunned at how sloppy the science was.

--- Gary Taubes

Gabrielle Lyon expresses her surprise at the continued reliance on epidemiology in clinical practice, despite its limitations as a source of reliable data 4.