• I have a question about micro sucks. Do you remember talking about that topic?

  • Sources:

    Yes, the concept of "micro sucks" was discussed in the episode titled "How to Increase Your Willpower & Tenacity" on the . In this context, micro sucks refer to smaller challenges or discomforts that can help build discipline and mental resilience.

    Here are some key points Andrew Huberman made about micro sucks:

    • Definition: Micro sucks are tasks that require effort and push you outside your comfort zone, such as doing an extra set of exercises after your workout or resisting the urge to check your phone during a workout. These tasks are intentionally designed to create a bit of discomfort that leads to personal growth 1.

    • Activation of Brain Areas: Engaging in these challenging behaviors activates the anterior mid cingulate cortex, which is associated with effort and the resilience to push through difficulties. Huberman emphasizes that rather than opting for easy and enjoyable tasks, one should choose those that are uncomfortable yet beneficial for growth 2.

    • Practical Examples: Huberman suggests incorporating micro sucks into daily routines. For instance, if practicing intermittent fasting, one might wait an extra 15 minutes to eat. The idea is to build tenacity and willpower by resisting actions one naturally wants to take 3.

    • Finding Balance: While embracing micro sucks is valuable for building discipline, it's important to be mindful of the potential psychological impact of pushing too hard. The goal is to find a healthy balance to avoid negative outcomes 2 3.

    These concepts are framed within a broader discussion about enhancing willpower and mental fortitude through deliberate and uncomfortable challenges.

    RELATED QUESTIONS
  • My question is, if you have an activity that sucks, should you avoid trying to make it better (like listening to an audiobook or music)? Is it better to just let it suck as much as possible?

  • In the discussion surrounding micro sucks and challenging activities, Andrew Huberman suggests that intentionally engaging in discomfort can be beneficial for building resilience and willpower. However, he does not explicitly state that one should completely avoid making a challenging activity more enjoyable.

    Here are some considerations based on the principles discussed in the :

    1. Purpose of Discomfort: The idea behind embracing "micro sucks" is to endure manageable discomfort that fosters growth. This discomfort helps activate brain systems associated with effort and resilience. However, making an activity more enjoyable doesn't necessarily negate these benefits.

    2. Balance: While maintaining the "suck" of a task can be valuable for developing tenacity, adding elements like music or an audiobook may not diminish the beneficial effects if it helps you sustain longer engagement with the task at hand. The goal is to create a balance where you’re not overly comfortable but can still engage effectively.

    3. Mindset: If listening to music or an audiobook allows you to push through the experience without making it too easy, it could enhance your overall performance or experience, making the challenge more bearable without fully avoiding discomfort.

    4. Personal Preference: Ultimately, it depends on individual preferences. Some people may find that adding enjoyable elements helps them cope with the challenge better, while others may prefer a more austere approach to fully embrace and gain from the discomfort.

    In conclusion, rather than strictly avoiding pleasurable distractions during tough tasks, consider the context and your goals. Adding enjoyable elements can be beneficial as long as they don’t detract from the core challenge you wish to embrace.

      RELATED QUESTIONS
    • That makes sense. For example, folding laundry is a micro suck for me. So listening to an audiobook while I fold laundry is an improvement, but the idea of folding laundry still sucks, so it probably still qualifies.

    • Your example of folding laundry as a "micro suck" fits well within the framework discussed by Andrew Huberman. Engaging in an activity you find less enjoyable, like folding laundry, while listening to an audiobook does align with the idea of enduring manageable discomfort.

      1. Retention of Challenge: Even though you're adding an enjoyable component, the core task still qualifies as a micro suck, allowing you to respond to the discomfort while enhancing the experience.

      2. Resilience Building: This approach doesn’t diminish the opportunity to build resilience. Keeping engaged with a less enjoyable task while integrating something you enjoy (like audiobooks) can help you endure the unpleasantness longer and potentially build a more positive association with the task over time.

      So, incorporating enjoyable elements during such tasks is a valid strategy to make the experience more bearable while still facing the underlying challenge.

        RELATED QUESTIONS